Get this reporting ad-free in your inbox via Substack or Patreon

In February, a coalition of local governments filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration challenging Trump’s executive orders against sanctuary cities. Weeks later, 11 more jurisdictions joined the lawsuit, with another 34 joining last week. These states represent more than 28 million people across the country, according to the Public Rights Project, which is representing the Cities of Minneapolis, New Haven, Portland, St. Paul, Santa Fe, and Seattle.

Sanctuary policies are designed, in part, to maintain the separation of law enforcement powers, limiting how local law enforcement and other government agencies assist in enforcing federal immigration laws, while keeping their resources available for their local communities. The policies vary, but they often involve restrictions on asking about immigration status, honoring immigration detainers, or sharing information with federal immigration officials.

“With respect to sanctuary jurisdictions that are designated [as sanctuary cities], the head of each executive department or agency (agency), in coordination with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and as permitted by law, shall identify appropriate Federal funds to sanctuary jurisdictions, including grants and contracts, for suspension or termination, as appropriate,” reads one Executive Order

The lawsuit argues that forcing local governments to aid in immigration enforcement violates the 10th Amendment and other constitutional protections, including the separation of powers, while also challenging the “suspension or termination” of federal funding, grants, and contracts. As part of a request for a preliminary injunction in March, parties to the lawsuit explained how federal funding is essential for providing and maintaining public services in their communities.

In April, a preliminary injunction was granted. Earlier this week, the coalition amended its lawsuit to include the additional 34 local governments, bringing the total number of plaintiffs challenging Trump’s executive orders to 50. As the White House threatens to terminate congressionally approved funding unless communities comply with its orders, the Department of Justice (DOJ) authorized investigations of officials who refuse to cooperate with immigration enforcement.

“These unlawful executive orders are fear tactics — plain and simple,” said Jill Habig, founder and CEO of Public Rights Project. “The Trump administration is asserting power it doesn’t have to coerce compliance with its extreme federal deportation agenda. We need to ignore the bluster and pay attention to facts: sanctuary policies make us all safer and ensure communities are welcoming places for everyone.”

In May, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a list of cities, counties, and police departments it was targeting under Trump’s executive order. The list faced swift backlash from mayors and law enforcement officials who challenged the list’s accuracy and highlighted the negative impacts on community relations and trust. DHS later removed the list, saying it needed to reassess its approach and methodology.

“These sanctuary city politicians are endangering Americans and our law enforcement in order to protect violent criminal illegal aliens,” said DHS Secretary Kristi Noem in May. “We are exposing these sanctuary politicians who harbor criminal illegal aliens and defy federal law.

By creating an environment of fear, citizens and noncitizens alike will be less likely to report crimes to police. These efforts, disproportionately employed in nonwhite communities that blur the lines between federal and state law enforcement, will only create a reluctant society unwilling to cooperate with militarized local and state police and federal authorities. That the cities targeted are largely nonwhite communities speaks to just how problematic all of this is.

Putting a bullseye on local government leaders adds to those fears.

Read the Order Granting a Preliminary Injunction

Read the Lawsuit


Discover more from The Antagonist Magazine

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


The Antagonist Magazine is a project made up of journalists, activists, and writers focused on amplifying the stories of marginalized communities. The goal is to educate the public by sharing narratives focused on independent voices. Born of an online community in 2019, our platform operates independently, free of corporate influence. Please consider supporting the work of dozens of writers from various communities.

Arturo is an anti-racist political nerd. He is an upcoming author, journalist, advocate for social justice, and a married father of three. He is a top writer on Medium and a regular contributor to several news media outlets. He writes educational and informative material about systemic racism, white supremacy, and racial injustice.

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.